|
The following article was
first published in the Nov/Dec 1999 issue of the American Federation of
Aviculture (AFA) Watchbird.
The Spix's Macaw
Conservation Program: A Non-Extinction Story©
Natasha Schischakin
The Spix's Macaw Cyanopsitta
spixii, one of the world's most critically endangered species, was recently
the focus of three days of meetings in Houston, Texas (September 30 - October 2,
1999). Endemic to one small area of Northeastern Brazil, in a habitat known as
the "caatinga" (an and region of flat savanna scrubland interspersed
with seasonal creeks and gallery forests), the Spix's Macaw was considered to be
extinct in the wild 10 years ago. Nevertheless, this species is now recovering
through the concerted efforts of the Brazilian government and an international
committee whose members include the aviculturists that hold this endangered
species, government officials, conservationists and ornithologists.
With only one known
remaining bird in nature, the conservation of this species is dependent on the
success of the captive-breeding and field program, The global captive population
has grown significantly from a low of 11 known birds to 60 (54 of which are
captive-hatched); new holders are participating in the program, the field
research program has collected valuable data on the natural history of this
species and the ecology of the region, a strong community outreach program is in
place, habitat protection and restoration projects are ongoing, and
basic-research on Psittacine reintroduction techniques has been successfully
completed. The progress of the last 10 years has been dramatic.
The meeting, hosted by
the Houston Zoo, included a symposium entitled "The Spix's Macaw -
Conservation and Management of an Endangered Species," focusing on the last
10 years of field research, community outreach and captive-breeding efforts; the
2nd Workshop on Population Management and Captive Breeding of the Spix's Macaw;
and the official meeting of the Permanent Committee for the Recovery of the
Spix's Macaw. This meeting highlighted the importance of the collaborative
nature of this program, which is proving to be a model of international
public/private collaboration in endangered species management..
Misleading
Headlines
However, recently
published articles promote a much different scenario. In London, The Times
headline screamed that "Collector's may drive world's rarest parrot to
extinction" and the World Parrot Trust's PsittaScene August 1999 newsletter
article entitled "More on Spix's Macaw" claimed that "the holders
of the captive birds simply refuse to cooperate" and included much
erroneous information. Readers of these articles cannot be faulted for believing
the stories, as these seem to be reliable and knowledgeable sources.
Unfortunately these
type of misinformed statements are great for "sound bytes" that
attract media attention, but do not contribute to the conservation of the
species. This is not the first time that the Spix's Macaw has been used as a
political and fundraising tool, a "symbol" of how aviculture
contributed to this species' demise.
The Actual Story
If those headlines are
false, then what is the actual story? It is a story that involves a great amount
of hard work, both in the field and in the captive breeding efforts. It is also
a story of, success against great odds, and international collaboration between
public and private sector that is unparalleled. How can one make that statement
considering the recent reports? The answer is easy - with facts and data.
The Vanishing
Spix's Macaw
To truly understand
the current situation of the Spix's Macaw conservation effort, one must first go
back to the late 1980s when only a handful of ornithologists and aviculturists
realized that this species was on the verge of quietly vanishing. In an attempt
to draw attention to this situation, a meeting was held by Loro Parque, a major
bird park in the Canary Islands, Spain (which had a pair of Spix's Macaws in its
collection). Although this attempt was unsuccessful, it laid the groundwork for
the future international program.
The status of the
Spix's Macaw was at the center of much controversy at the 1988 meeting of the
now extinct IUCN-SSC Parrot Specialist Group in Curitiba, Brazil. Although
everyone talked about the need to develop a recovery program, there was no
chance for a consensus as the participants differed greatly on how to proceed as
politics and personalities got in the way of any agreement. Much of the meeting
was spent on arguing about the legality of individual captive birds and not on
steps to develop an urgently needed recovery effort. Many ornithologists and
conservationists were already considering the Spix's Macaw extinct, believing
that the few captive birds scattered throughout Brazil and the world were relics
of no conservation value. At that time, it was much easier to blame the wildlife
trade and aviculture for this species' demise than to formulate a strategy to
save it.
Enter IBAMA
It was not until 1989
that the program officially began with the establishment by the Brazilian
wildlife authorities of IBAMA (Brazilian Institute for the Environment and
Natural Renewable Resources) of a temporary working group to review the status
of this species and to make recommendations to the government for its recovery.
This was a new approach for the government, which considered this a pioneering
group. As a member of this original group, it was clear to us that the situation
was beyond critical. The wild population was believed to be extinct and we came
up with only I I confirmed birds worldwide in captivity (although many more were
rumored to exist).
The working group's
directives from the government were not to decide that the species was extinct,
but to develop a last minute management plan to save it. The focus had to be on
the few remaining birds in captivity and the first priority was to set up a
breeding program for the existing birds in Brazil. It was not an easy task - as
everyone was willing to participate, but no wanted to give up their bird to move
it to another location. All were unsexed and a few were held as single
specimens. At that time, the Brazilian government and the holders were reluctant
to use laparoscopy, considering it too risky.
To solve this problem,
the Houston and National Zoos supported the sexing of the Brazilian birds
through karyotyping, a technique which was acceptable to all. After obtaining
the necessary USFWS, USDA (first time they allowed importation of Psittacine
samples without quarantine or irradiation) and CITES permissions, I collected
blood-feather samples from all known birds in Brazil. Unfortunately there was a
short 24 hour window to get them to the laboratory. With help from the U.S.
State Department representative who was waiting at the plane's door to help with
customs, the samples and I made our connection in Miami and arrived safely at
the Avian Genetic Sexing Laboratory of Marc Valentine in Memphis, TN in less
than 16 hours! We were finally on our way to starting the program.
A Permanent
Committee
Another of the working
group's duties was to establish the structure for the Permanent Committee.
Everyone recognized that this had to include all international holders, and that
it would have to be a group which represented all the stakeholders in the
program. The Brazilian government accepted the recommendations and in 1990,
established the Permanent Committee for the Recovery of the Spix's Macaw. This
was a ground-breaking event, as it brought together many different factions,
including Brazilian governmental officials, zoo representatives, national and
international holders of the species, ornithologists, and conservationists
together with only one single goal - to save this species.
The newly formed
Committee continued to focus on emergency measures needed to save this species.
The situation was so critical that all ideas and avenues were open to
discussion, including previously unthinkable strategies such as amnesty. It was
widely believed that many holders kept birds "underground," but were
unwilling to join the conservation effort because of the prosecution and
confiscation threat. if that were true, there was a very real risk that they
would simply disappear without ever being included in the recovery program. In
1990, the Brazilian government passed an amnesty decree to all holders of Spix's
Macaws. Although very controversial in some circles (who were not involved in
the recovery effort), it meant to show the goodwill of the Brazilian government
towards any holders and to encourage full participation in the program. This was
a very pragmatic approach to a very serious problem and placed the recovery of
the species above politics.
Some individuals
continue to believe that current holders involved in the Committee do so because
of the amnesty offer, but this is incorrect. All of the Spix's Macaw holders'
birds are legal in their respective countries and recognized as legal by the
Brazilian government. The birds in Brazil are property of the government and
include the birds donated by Loro Parque to Brazil in 1977. All holders have
agreed to manage their birds as part of one global population, under the
oversight of the Committee (in which they also participate). Unfortunately, in
the six years that the amnesty decree was in effect, not one new holder was
admitted to the Committee under its conditions. Many of the dozens of supposed
illegal birds turned out to be "phantoms," never actually
materializing. Despite this, I am always hopeful that we will find new birds
that have been "underground."
Found - the Last
Wild Spix's
Soon after the first
meeting of the Committee in 1990, reports came of the discovery (or
re-discovery) of one remaining bird near the small rural town of Curaça in
Northeastern Brazil. An ICBP (now BirdLife International) organized expedition
had discovered its location with the help of Brazilian ornithologist Carlos
Yamashita who had information on the bird's existence. Although they knew the
basic area, it was still a difficult task, much like "searching for a
needle in a haystack." Luckily, they were successful and found it.
Elation at the
discovery soon changed to shock when ICBP chose to inform the world of this
discovery through a major press briefing, complete with a detailed map
(including the major roads) of the region mapping the bird's exact location. The
Brazilian wildlife authorities had feared that by providing such detailed information
of the location of this priceless bird, ICBP actually endangered it. The region
was now open not only to new poachers, but also to anyone thinking they could
get rich quick, or for some misguided soul to take the "last one" from
the wild.
The Brazilian wildlife
authorities scrambled to ensure protection, but only to realize that it was
nearly impossible to provide enough security due to the large range of this
single bird and without local support. Luckily, this last Spix's Macaw was
clever enough to escape capture, adding to the myth that it somehow possessed
supernatural powers.
Field Program
Begins
The re-discovery of
this last bird added a new dimension to the conservation program and provided a
unique opportunity to learn about the natural history of this species in the
wild. It also brought a field research component to the recovery effort that had
concentrated on the captive population. Although there were some questions as to
the value derived from studying a single specimen, the information collected has
proven invaluable. A field biologist has been permanently stationed in the
region since 1991, collecting valuable biological data on the last Spix's Macaw,
including details about daily movement patterns, seasonal adjustments to
drought, food habits, and habitat utilization.
Historical data was
also collected, which included information on population numbers, range,
poaching, and habitat status. Research concluded that the Spix's Macaw requires
a large home range and that it utilized certain habitat islands on a seasonal
level for food. Even the observations of the attempted reproductive efforts of
the Spix's Macaw with an Illiger's Macaw (Ara maracana) provided details
of its reproductive behavior patterns.
How Many Were
There?
Information from the
wild bird has allowed researchers to form a better idea of possible historic
population numbers for this species. Some had claimed that the Spix's Macaw
population previously numbered in the thousands, but there is no evidence to
support such a figure. Spix himself recognized the species' scarcity in 1819
when he collected the type specimen and described the species as
"gregarious and rare" in the accompanying notes. This was a juvenile
bird, later described as Cyanopsitta spixxi by Wagler in 1832. It is the
only collected museum specimen of this species (all others are derived from
captive collections). Such a diminished population was certainly at great risk
of extinction, and poaching for the wild bird trade (conducted mostly at the
bidding of one infamous middle-man from a nearby town, whom the government now
believes has moved on to coordinating the poaching of Lear's Macaws) caused the
final catastrophic decline of this species in the wild. Although no one disputes
that the final blow came from the illegal trade, the principal cause for the
species' decline is believed to be the loss of primary habitat in the region
resulting from 500 years of human colonization.
Field researchers
believe that in the last century, the Curaça population of Spix's Macaws
probably did not number more than 60 individual birds. This figure was
extrapolated from habitat data and from interviews of the older people in the
community. This is an especially significant number for the recovery effort, as
the captive-breeding program has now reached 60 birds, the same as the
historical wild population.
Field Biologist
& the Cowboys
After arriving in the
area, the first field biologist of the project, Marcos Da Re quickly realized
that he could not track the bird alone because of its large home range and daily
movements, so he turned to community for help. In particular, the "vaqueiros"
or cowboys of the region were enlisted to help keep track of the Spix's. This
strategy had the additional benefit in that it involved the local people in the
project and gave them first-hand knowledge of how rare and important this
species really was. Although many had always noticed the bird, some even
obtained watches to track the time that they saw it, becoming additional
volunteer "field-team" participants and providing needed manpower and
help to the project.
Macaw Enters Local
Mythology
As they learned more
about the situation of the Spix's Macaw, many simply could not believe that it
could be down to only one bird, remembering the flock was used to roost in the
trees along the creek beds of the area. It was a great revelation to find out
that indeed that was true. Since then, the last Spix's has become part of the
local mythology and his life is often equated to their own experiences. The
story they tell is that the Spix's Macaw has faced hard times and endured, just
as they have. He lost his family, survived poachers and is still in the wild, a
true survivor, just as they are. They have faced drought and famine, lost family
members to death and migration to the large cities, but those that are left
still hold on to their way of life, just like the Spix's Macaw holds on to his
area and way of life in the wild. They feel that they are both true survivors
and are linked by their lives in the "caatinga." I believe there is a
great amount of truth in this view.
An often asked
question is why is the Spix's Macaw program involved in the community outreach
efforts when we should be concentrating on ensuring the safety of the last bird.
Shouldn't we be hiring guards and putting up fences? The truth is that no matter
what, conservation is always local in scope. It always comes down to very basic
issues, such as providing one's family with food, shelter and basic survival. No
matter how lofty the global vision, securing the program locally where the
species is -- even if it is the last bird (as in the case of the Spix's Macaw).
We could bring it into captivity and forget about the wild, but then we would be
left with a living museum collection. The Committee has chosen to fight this
battle and to secure a place for this species, not only in nature, but also
within the community.
The poverty of the
region, the harshness of the climate, and the difficulty of life, are
all-important factors in the daily management of the field project. The support
from the locals for the program provides a safety-net for the last Spix's Macaw
and to those that are to be reintroduced in the future. The capture of a Spix's
Macaw has become unthinkable in the region - a cultural taboo. No
barbed-wire fence or armed guard could have achieved this outcome. The community
projects resulted from very real needs of the people of the area and included a
campaign against hunger, the building of rural schoolhouses, and even the
restoration of a century old theater. Certainly not your usual community-based
education and outreach programs.
Famine - and Relief
When the field project
was initiated, the intent was to work with the local community and get their
support for the project. But then the effects of a prolonged drought created a
major famine in the region, hitting the locality of the Spix's Macaw range
especially hard. It became particularly difficult to maintain the project on the
same level. How could we continue protecting a single bird when people were
dying? There was only one thing to do, and that was to use the program and the
Spix's Macaw to bring relief to those who were suffering the most.
In a campaign
coordinated by the workers of the Brasilia offices of IBAMA, the National Park
of Brasilia was opened to the public on a weekend, asking for the donation of a
kilogram of non-perishable food for the entrance fee, This volunteer effort by
government employees raised seven tons of basic food items in the name of the
Spix's Macaw. It was transported to Curaça, by the trucking company of one of
the Brazilian Spix's Macaw holders, Mauricio dos Santos. The food was
distributed through the rural school teachers network, as well as the city
public schools.
Now many people of the
region not only fully support the conservation program, but also credit the
Spix's Macaw with helping them and their families survive the famine. Seeing the
effects and devastation of this drought brought a very realistic and somber
attitude to the program, providing a different perspective on the intricacies of
conservation.
Education - a 50-50
Program
Another issue that
affected almost Family in the rural area was the )f education opportunities for
children. This was identified as a problem by biologist Marcos Da Re after
beginning the field project. Education was valued and children made a great
effort to study, walking long distances to designated houses of a "rural
schoolteacher" (local women who had been trained by education extension
agents in providing education up to fourth grade to children). Classes were held
in rooms in the small shacks or out in the yards. Although they tried, these
schoolteachers had nothing to help the students. Books were almost non-existent,
notebooks, pencils and supplies were shared.
Da Re came up with a
solution through a 50-50 partnership between the project and the community. The
Spix's project provided the materials and the locals provided the labor in the
construction of local one-room schoolhouses that could serve the local children
and as community centers. That is how a cooperative program called the
"Rural Schoolhouse Program" was started and the first Ararinha Azul
(Spix's Macaw) Schoolhouse was built.
The Houston Zoo and
the Santa Ana Zoo are contributing to this pioneering project. It is hoped that
by investing in basic education, the children of the community grow up to be
literate adults who can understand how to manage and conserve the scarce
resources of the region, including the species of the area. This investment
shows that the program is a member and partner of the community, not an
adversary.
Theaters
The restoration of the
theater was quite extraordinary, but even this project became controversial in
some circles. How does the restoration of an almost century old theater in a
nearly forgotten small town in Northeastern Brazil affect conservation?
Considerably. It
started through a series of coincidences and luck. After a Spix's Macaw
Committee meeting in Brazil, many of the participants traveled to Curaça where
the local community put on a play in a dilapidated old theater in the center of
the small town. This play was told from the viewpoint of the last Spix's. it
traced with music and action the events of his life, including the loss of the
"family" to poachers, his loneliness, the need for a mate (therefore
the pairing with the Illiger's female), as well as the future which would
include the return of his mate. This fairy tale ended with the small fuzzy chick
peering happily from the nest cavity and the proud parents watching over it. It
was a story of hope and of success in adversity a powerful and emotional message
to all attending.
The effort and
community spirit so impressed everyone, that Wolfgang Kiessling of Loro Parque,
Spain, arranged a grant from the Loro Parque Foundation for the restoration of
this theater that was matched by the community in both funds and labor. Finally,
in 1996, the renovation was completed in time for the re-inauguration of the
"Teatro Raul Coelho" and the celebration of its 100th anniversary. The
theater has become the heart of this small town and is central to many events
and celebrations, reminding them of the value of preserving and ensuring the
security of the Spix's Macaw and the project.
How to Establish a
Wild Population?
The establishment of a
wild population has always been one of the goals of the recovery program for the
Spix's Macaw. However, before initiating a reintroduction for such a critically
endangered species, four important goals had to be completed.
1. The captive
population had to reach a stable, self-sustaining reproductive level from a
genetic and demographic standpoint to absorb the removal of potential breeders.
2. There had to be a
safe and viable environment to return this species to the wild.
3. There had to be a
local infrastructure capable of supporting the reintroduction and monitoring of
the released birds.
4. The reintroduction
techniques had to be developed which were appropriate to this and region.
Throughout the
program, there have been many calls (and even demands) from various groups for
the immediate reintroduction of captive birds to the wild, not understanding
that such a simplistic approach could in fact threaten the species in the rush
to save it. These demands were often made without much comprehension of the
difficulties involved in reintroduction programs for psittacines or even any
idea of the status of the captive population and the availability of birds for
release.
Let the Last One
Fly Free
In late 1992, after
almost two years of field research, the Committee sponsored a Population and
Habitat Viability Analysis (PHVA) Workshop, facilitated by the IUCN-SSC Captive
Breeding Specialist Group Chairman Dr. Ulysses Seal. It was at this meeting that
it was decided that this last surviving bird would not be captured for the
breeding program as it was more important to the conservation effort in the
wild. The field data had clearly shown that its survival skills and knowledge of
the wild made this last bird an important potential "teacher" for
future reintroduced Spix's Macaws.
And Find a Mate
After the decision to
leave the wild bird in nature was made, the reintroduction of another bird to
join the last one was be considered, so the captive population was closely
examined for potential reintroduction candidates. Of all the captive birds, only
one fit a very specific profile, which made her the best (and only) candidate
for reintroduction at that time. This was a bird that was known to have been the
last one taken into captivity, as an adult, from the wild. According to
information collected from local poachers, she was taken while in the nest on
eggs (which were broken during capture). She was held at the Chaparral facility
in Recife, Brazil, and paired with a male transferred from the Sao Paulo Zoo.
Although compatible, this pair had shown little breeding activity. A decision
was made to reintroduce this individual bird to the region as she likely had the
most experience and survival skills. (After the release, a captive bred female
from Birds International, Inc. in the Philippines was later transferred to
Brazil and paired with this remaining male.)
But .. is it REALLY
a Male?
Although we had
identified the female which would be released to the wild, we still had t deal
with another serious question - the sex of the last bird. Because of its
behavior, the field biologists believed that it was a male. on the other hand,
as anyone who works with psittacines well knows, same sex pairings are not
uncommon and behavior is not always a good indicator. To sex the last bird with
available techniques meant that we had to capture a very wary bird that had
outwitted the best poachers. Out of concern that we could endanger its life
through the stress of capture, it was decided that a method would have to he
found that did not include capture. A potential technique still in the
investigative stages was the use of DNA, in this case, from molted feathers.
Dr. Griffiths, of
Oxford University, in the United Kingdom took on this problem, and finally
perfected this sexing technique. Feathers were collected from known roosting
sites of the wild Spix's Macaw and sent to the UK for testing. In 1995, after
nearly two years of research, and right before the scheduled transfer of the
female to the region, we were given an answer the wild bird was definitely a
male! (Note: Dr. Griffiths later published his findings in the distinguished
scientific journal Nature. This DNA sexing technology, originally
developed to sex the last Spix's Macaw in the wild is now routinely used in
aviculture.)
Hope and
Disappointment
The wild caught adult
female was transferred to the newly built reintroduction facility with the
knowledge that she would have the opportunity to pair with a male. She then
spent over seven months in the reintroduction facility adapting to the new
environment, diet, and long flights. The field researchers were amazed at her
adeptness in changing to the local food items (adeptly opening nuts on the first
try), as well as her apparent innate ability to recognize predators. It was felt
that the right choice had been made and that she had adapted better than anyone
had hoped or anticipated.
After her release, the
field team was able to monitor her for two months. She had adapted extremely
well, spending the last month flying and easily keeping up with the male. They
appeared very compatible with much interaction and allopreening behavior. It
seemed that she had beaten the odds and survived in the wild. By now, the story
of the last wild bird and the reintroduced female had taken on fairy tale
dimensions and seemed to be following the plot of the play presented years
before in the theater. But this real story did not have the expected happy
ending with a fuzzy blue chick peering from the nest.
Overnight, the field
team lost track of her. Her sudden disappearance came as a shock not only to the
field team, but to the local, national, and international communities. Only in
the last few months, has the field staff been able to uncover credible evidence
that she died through a collision with one of the high power lines that crosses
the reintroduction area.
The Reintroduction
Strategy
Although the release
of this Spix's Macaw female did not have the hoped for results, it is considered
an important step in the reintroduction program. Much was learned from the
experience, which has benefited future reintroduction efforts. A complex
reintroduction infrastructure and holding facility has been built and a field
base established because of this effort. The restoration strategy for this
species to the wild has never been based on the idea of a single pair of
reproducing birds. It was just a first step in a long-term strategy of periodic
supplementation of the wild population by reintroduced captive bred birds. (A
strategy defined in 1992 at the CBSG Population and Habitat Viability Analysis
Workshop.)
Since that initial
reintroduction attempt, two major experiments in psittacine reintroduction have
been conducted by the field staff. The first critically important project was
designed to develop the necessary protocols for eventual reintroduction of
captive-reared Spix's Macaws. To do this, captive-hatched Illiger's Macaws (both
hand- and parent-reared) were chosen from Loro Parque in Spain. These were
quarantined and eventually transferred to the reintroduction facility where they
were fitted with radio-collars and allowed to adapt to the region. Numerous
problems had to be faced, including the unexpected destruction of the
radio-collars by the birds and the failure of the radios to work.
This experience
resulted in changes to the reintroduction protocols and the successful
utilization of tail- mounted transmitters. Finally, in December of 1998 and
early January 1999, a total of nine birds were released to the wild. Of these,
one died within a week and another disappeared, but seven of the reintroduced
birds have adapted well to the wild. This is considered an excellent survival
rate for reintroduced captive-bred birds, which we believe is the result of the
long adaptation period and acclimatization period. A pair formed by the
reintroduced Illiger's Macaws has now occupied a nest hole and maybe will breed
this season.
The second project
conducted by the field team involved the application of the commonly used
avicultural technique of fostering chicks. As it was apparent that the Spix's
Macaw male and Illiger's Macaw female were a bonded pair which attempted to nest
each season, this behavior could be used in the recovery program. If Spix's eggs
were available, could they not be raised by the mixed-species pair? Of course,
this meant that a breeding pair had to be perfectly synchronized with the wild
pair.. but that's another problem we are working on. Before even risking such a
procedure, the team had to determine whether the pair could be successful as
parents. To test this, Field Program Coordinator Yara Barros closely monitored
the Spix's nest to determine egg laying and brooding, replacing their eggs with
wooden ones. As the "hatching" dates approached, she changed out the
eggs for newly hatched Illiger's Macaw chicks from a nearby Illiger's nest,
imitating a "natural" hatching sequence. The Spix's and Illiger's
Macaw pair successfully fledged the chicks, showing us that the pair could be
used for the actual fostering of Spix's Macaws to the wild. Of course, a concern
has been that they would then look to Illiger's as mates, but it appears that
the Illiger's chicks have taken on many of the Spix's characteristics, including
behavior and vocalizations. Behavior data on these Illiger's should give us
additional information of the effects of fostering on the chicks.
Captive Breeding a
Key
The field research,
community outreach and reintroduction program development has been successful,
but everyone is keenly aware that the eventual reestablishment of Spix's Macaws
to the wild depends on the success of the captive breeding program. Without
available birds for reintroduction, it will be impossible to consider the
establishment of a wild population. The Spix's Macaw captive breeding program is
one of the few species which is managed as a single global population. In the
last decade, the captive breeding and management program has made tremendous
progress in increasing the population and ensuring the best possible genetic and
demographic profile. in 1993, to better manage the growing population, the
Committee established the Working Group on Captive Breeding, which I coordinate.
International
Collaboration and Trust
In the beginning of
the program, there weren't many options for setting up pairs. As the population
increased and a few older birds died, it became important to move the birds
between facilities for genetic and demographic purposes. In the last 10 years,
we have transferred birds between the facilities of Birds International, Inc. in
the Philippines to Brazil and Switzerland, Swiss birds have been transferred to
the Philippines, a bird from Vogelpark Walsrode in Germany was transferred to
Brazil and later the Philippines, a total of three birds have been transferred
from the Philippines to Brazil and two birds have been transferred from the Sao
Paulo Zoo in Brazil to the Loro Parque facilities in Spain. This last transfer
was an important step in the program in which the Brazilian government
recognized the global nature of this conservation effort and agreed to send two
Brazilian held birds to an international facility for breeding purposes. To
achieve this level of exchanges for breeding purposes takes a great degree of
collaboration and trust, and could not have been accomplished without the
support of the breeders who hold the future of the Spix's Macaw in their
collections.
In developing the
population management strategies for this species, the Working Group on Captive
Breeding has held two technical workshops which bring together everyone involved
in the captive-breeding program, as well as advisors, to periodically evaluate
the program strategies, breeding status and management plan. Although the
population is managed closely, this type of in-depth population masterplan
evaluation is necessary as the population increases and young birds approach
breeding age. The 1st Workshop on Captive Breeding of the Spix's Macaw was held
in 1994, in conjunction with the CITES Conference in Fort Lauderdale, FL, and
hosted by the CITES Secretariat. It was successful in defining the genetic and
demographic management strategy for this species and included major transfers
and new pairings of birds.
What Next?
The 2nd Workshop on
Captive Breeding and Population Management of the Spix's Macaw, recently held in
Houston, focused on the development of a collaboration and trust through a
comprehensive evaluation of each individual bird in the population. The captive
population now stands at 60 captive birds, of which 54 are captive bred. This is
a significant figure and is expected to increase significantly as the new young
pairs come into reproduction. The need to transfer birds to new facilities was
also addressed as an important step in the growth of the program to ensure
against catastrophes at any single facility that could affect the population.
This is an ongoing effort, with the in-country transfer of birds between holders
in Switzerland already implemented. As the population steadily increases, the
utilization of captive-bred birds for the reintroduction program has become an
option for the first time in the recovery program. Recommendations for new
pairings, transfers, and research were made (including the identification of
captive-bred birds destined for the reintroduction program).
The Houston Zoo
workshop exemplified the level of cooperation among the participants, which
included all Committee members, collaborators and invited observers.
Participants included myself as the Committee's Coordinator of the Spix's Macaw
Working Group on Captive Breeding, Antonio de Dios (Birds International, Inc.,
Philippines); Wolfgang Kiessling (Loro Parque, Spain); Luis Sanfilippo (Sao
Paulo Zoo, Brazil); Mauricio dos Santos (Criadouro Chaparral, Brazil); Roland
Messer (Swiss Breeders, Switzerland); Dr. Iolita Bampi IBAMA, Brazil); Carlos
Yamashita (IBAMA, Brazil); Pedro Scherer Neto (Brazilian Ornithological Society,
Brazil); Monica Koch (CEMAVE, Brazil); Yara Barros (Spix's Macaw Field Program
Coordinator); Steffen Patzwhal (Parc Paradisio, Belgium); Yves de Soye (Loro
Parque Foundation, Spain); Dr. Friedrich Janeczek (Birds International, Inc.,
European Representative); Dr. Susan Clubb (Loro, Parque and AZA Macaw Group
Veterinary Advisor); Robert J. Berry (AFA, USA); Dr. Richard Porter (IAS, USA);
Lee Schoen (Houston Zoo, USA); Dr. Branson Ritchie (University of Georgia, USA);
Dr. Darrel Styles (AFA Conservation Committee and AAV Aviculture Committee) and
Laurue Bingaman-Lackey ( AZA Small Population Management Advisory Group.)
The meeting of the
Permanent Committee for the Recovery of the Spix's Macaw was successful in
determining the next steps in the long-term management plan for this species,
both in captivity and the wild. Some of the decisions made included approval of
land acquisition for the establishment of a permanent research base in the
region, increasing the rural schoolhouse and community programs, identification
of captive-bred birds to the reintroduction project, approval of new holders and
captive-breeding facilities, fund-raising, and many other projects.
Although this species
is still a long way from eventual recovery, it is the first time that the
captive population is stable enough for an active reintroduction program of
Spix's Macaws.
Conclusion
As I finish this
"non-extinction" report of the Spix's Macaw, I hope that it will have
provided the readers with not only an overview of this conservation effort, but
also of the issues, problems and even conflicts involved in its conservation.
Many people and organizations have played an important role in the conservation
program for this species. However, we could have never come this far without the
full support of the Brazilian wildlife authorities of IBAMA, and in particular
the work and leadership of Dr. Iolita Bampi (Chief of the Wildlife Department
DEVIS). Certainly no one can claim that this species is yet safe from
extinction, but when one considers its status only a short 10 years ago, one
cannot help but feel a deep sense of optimism for its future.
On my desk lies a
small blue puppet with fuzzy down that was once the star of a play telling the
fairy tale story of the Spix's Macaw. It is a reminder of an event in a
dilapidated old theater, in a small rural town, and of a group of children that
had been in the play. They had run up to me afterwards and given me the puppet
as a reminder to help them get a real Spix's chick.. Maybe we are not too far
off from fulfilling that wish.
Program Supporters
Support for the Spix's
Macaw recovery program has been provided by the following organizations:
Brazilian Institute
for the Environment and Natural Renewable Resources (IBAMA); Fundacion Loro
Parque; Ó Boticario Foundation; ASHOKA Foundation; Herbert Levy Institute;
Birds International, Inc.; WWF-Brazil; BirdLife International; Houston Zoo;
Grupo Relampago; AZA Brazil Conservation Action Partnership; The Moulton School;
Fundação Parque Zoologico de Sao Paulo; Santa Ana Zoo; Central Hydroelectric
Company of Sao Francisco; and many individuals involved in the program.
In the United States,
the Committee for the Recovery of the Spix's Macaw is working with the American
Federation of Aviculture (AFA); International Aviculturists Society (IAS);
American Zoo and Aquarium (AZA) Brazil Conservation Action Partnership; and
Houston Zoological Society to explore fundraising avenues to directly support
projects, including field research, land acquisition, the rural schoolhouse
program, reintroduction, and other priority programs.
Internationally, the
Loro Parque Foundation of Spain has been the primary funding group of the field
program and has played an essential role in raising funds for the conservation
of this species. If you are in interested in supporting the Spix's Macaw
program, please contact one of these groups for information.
References
Barros, Y. M. (1999)
"Conservation and Management of Spix's Macaw: Successful Experience of
Parental Care in a Hybrid Couple." Book of Abstracts, VI Neotropical Ornithological Congress, October 4-10, 1999, Monterrey and
Saltillo, Mexico.
Collar, NJ., Gonzaga,
L.P., Krabbe, N., Madrono-Nieto, L.G., Naranjo, T.A., Parker & Wege, D.C.
(1992) Threatened birds of the Americas. The ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book, Cambridge:
ICBP.
Juniper, A.T. and
Yamashita, C. (1991) The habitat and status of Spix's Macaw Cyanopsitta
spixii. Bird Conservation International 1: 1-9.
Schischakin, N. (1999)
"The Spix's Macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii) Studbook and Population
Management Plan of the IBAMA Permanent Committee for the Recovery of the Spix's
Macaw" Houston Zoological Gardens, Houston.
Sick, H. (1984)
Ornitologia Brasileira, Uma Introdução. 3rd ed. Editora Universidade de
Brasilia.
xxx
Copyright:
Copyright © 1999-2005
Natasha Schischakin. No part or contents of this article may be
reproduced by any means without the express consent of the author. Citation:
Schischakin, N. 1999. "The
Spix's Macaw Conservation Program: A Non-Extinction Story".
AFA
Watchbird XXVI (6): 46-55.
© Copyright 2005
Natasha Schischakin All Rights Reserved
|